Wednesday, September 14, 2005

香港的迪士尼之夢

有報章說:此次香港迪士尼夢幻之旅什麼什麼的...

說得好,整個香港都在發夢,尤其是政客及地產商、旅遊業和商鋪業主,以為迪士尼可把經濟狀况撥回最旺盛時代?

個人認為,贏家只會是迪士尼,香港迪士尼吸南方客,上海迪士尼(大有機會建成)吸北方客,無論有多少負面新聞,園內有多少衝突,計算精準的迪士尼依然能在合約上保有最大利益,以高超手段招徠遊客,賺個滿盤。

迪士尼吸乾吸盡遊客後還會給所在城市剩下多少利益?不同的是,上海聲勢正盛,建迪士尼有錦上添花之效;香港則信心低落,忽視發展已有優點,只懂花冤枉錢到處找水泡,找到後便抱着猛發夢,傾全力唱好投資,夢醒了又沮喪過,跟着又去找另一個!

延伸閱讀(我承認,以下選擇十分個人化 - 本人真的不Pro-迪士尼):
inmedia:獵奇行動論迪士尼(下金蛋的鼠?/聽說有一隻快樂的老鼠來了這裏/小米奇和三腳貓魔術)
徘徊於單行道:在美國看迪士尼開幕
Over the Rainbow:迪士尼永遠嘉年華?
Over the Rainbow:迪士尼細過維園
熊一豆:致家長們︰迪士尼是你/妳買給孩子的「歡樂夢」嗎?

2 comments:

無塵工作室 said...

If you have read the proposals, Hong Kong government actually holds 53% stake in the joint venture, therefore Disney becomes the minority shareholder, this means that HK government will actually get more profits than Disney from Disneyland HK - and I assure you, Disneyland HK will be as successful as the other ones.

Even though the Shanghai Disneyland will be built in 5 - 10 years' time, don't forget that throughout history Southern Chinese are richer than Northern Chinese, and for those people who chooses to come to HK, they don't only come for the smallest Disneyland in the world. HK has many other things that's unmatchable inside the Mainland, and they won't only spend money in Disneyland but all over HK.

Tell you what though, the biggest losers out of this are the taxpayers, because they don't share the profit directly.

Regina said...

you are right, but in this post I need to point out, Disneyland can't raise the economy's growth rate in a long term basis. eapecially to those who believed in the "迪士尼效應" and invested so much money.

and it is so annoying that Hong Kong 忽視發展已有優點.